@Article{SilvaWGSPGPOA:2021:LaVaDy,
author = "Silva, Ricardo Dal'Agnol da and Wagner, Fabien Hubert and
Galv{\~a}o, L{\^e}nio Soares and Streher, Annia Susin and
Phillips, Oliver L. and Gloor, Emanuel and Pugh, Thomas A. M. and
Ometto, Jean Pierre Henry Balbaud and Arag{\~a}o, Luiz Eduardo
Oliveira e Cruz de",
affiliation = "{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto
Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de
Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas
Espaciais (INPE)} and {University of Leeds} and {University of
Leeds} and {University of Birmingham} and {Instituto Nacional de
Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas
Espaciais (INPE)}",
title = "Large-scale variations in the dynamics of Amazon forest canopy
gaps from airborne lidar data and opportunities for tree mortality
estimates",
journal = "Scientific Reports",
year = "2021",
volume = "11",
number = "1",
pages = "e1388",
month = "Dec.",
abstract = "We report large-scale estimates of Amazonian gap dynamics using a
novel approach with large datasets of airborne light detection and
ranging (lidar), including five multi-temporal and 610 single-date
lidar datasets. Specifically, we (1) compared the fixed height and
relative height methods for gap delineation and established a
relationship between static and dynamic gaps (newly created gaps);
(2) explored potential environmental/climate drivers explaining
gap occurrence using generalized linear models; and (3)
cross-related our findings to mortality estimates from 181 field
plots. Our findings suggest that static gaps are significantly
correlated to dynamic gaps and can inform about structural changes
in the forest canopy. Moreover, the relative height outperformed
the fixed height method for gap delineation. Well-defined and
consistent spatial patterns of dynamic gaps were found over the
Amazon, while also revealing the dynamics of areas never sampled
in the field. The predominant pattern indicates 2035% higher gap
dynamics at the west and southeast than at the central-east and
north. These estimates were notably consistent with field
mortality patterns, but they showed 60% lower magnitude likely due
to the predominant detection of the broken/uprooted mode of death.
While topographic predictors did not explain gap occurrence, the
water deficit, soil fertility, forest flooding and degradation
were key drivers of gap variability at the regional scale. These
findings highlight the importance of lidar in providing
opportunities for large-scale gap dynamics and tree mortality
monitoring over the Amazon.",
doi = "10.1038/s41598-020-80809-w",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80809-w",
issn = "2045-2322",
language = "en",
targetfile = "dalagnol_large.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "2024, May 02"
}