@InProceedings{NunesCoelKuboHegg:2019:AsInVa,
author = "Nunes, Mateus Dias and Coelho, Simone Marilene Sievert da Costa
and Kubota, Paulo Yoshio and Hegglin, Michaela I.",
affiliation = "{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto
Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de
Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)}",
title = "Assessment of interannual variability of the ozone column in the
upper troposphere and low stratosphere between different
reanalysis of the S-RIP",
year = "2019",
organization = "Encontro de Alunos de P{\'o}s-Gradua{\c{c}}{\~a}o em
Meteorologia do CPTEC/INPE, 18. (EPGMET)",
abstract = "The different reanalysis data platforms help us to understand the
influence of gases on atmospheric circulation through past
variability. This information can be used as observations to serve
as a comparison with atmospheric climate models. Understanding the
role of major gases in the atmosphere, such as ozone (O3), in both
weather, seasonal and climate forecasts is of fundamental
importance for the performance and accurate development of climate
models. This paper aims to present the results of the
intercomparisons between different reanalysis that make up the
SPARC (Stratosphere\−troposphere Process and Role in
Climate) Reanalysis Intercomparison Project (S\−RIP) for
the ozone column. Multi\−Sensor Reanalysis (MSR) ozone
column was used. Multi\−sensor Reanalysis (MSR) was
constructed using an onboard satellite dataset of sensors
(approximately 15 sensors) of the ozone column. Climate Change
Initiative (CCI) vertical ozone profile data were used for the
analysis of different pressure levels. For this study, data from
six different reanalyses were used for both vertical profile and
total ozone column. It was utilized the reanalyses CAMS, CFSR,
ERA\−Interim, ERA\−5, MACC, and MERRA\−2. The
study period is from 2003 to 2012 because, for reasons of
comparison between the reanalysis, two of the six databases had
begun in 2003 (MACC and CAMS). Was calculated the average,
standard deviation, simple differences, and anomalies, monthly and
annual, for the total column ozone and ozone profile. The results
of the observations on the total ozone column (TCO) in more recent
reanalysis results in realistic representations of TCO in
reanalysis, except when the data coverage is lacking, such as
during the polar night. The vertical distribution of stratospheric
ozone presents problems in all reanalysis because they still
present difficulties in the representations of chemical and
radioactive interactions of high\−level models in the
stratosphere. However, significant biases are found in the mainly
vertical distribution of ozone found in the upper troposphere and
lower stratosphere in all reanalysis.",
conference-location = "Cachoeira Paulista, SP",
conference-year = "04-08 nov.",
language = "en",
targetfile = "Mateus_Dias_Nunes_et-al.pdf",
type = "Modelagem Geral",
urlaccessdate = "02 maio 2024"
}